You are able to avoid two calls to the bookmaker and lock in the current line on a later game by telling your bookmaker you want to make an “if” bet. “If” bets can be made on two games kicking off at exactly the same time. The bookmaker will wait before first game is over. If the first game wins, he will put an equal amount on the next game even though it has already been played.
Although an “if” bet is actually two straight bets at normal vig, you can’t decide later that you will no longer want the next bet. As soon as you make an “if” bet, the next bet can’t be cancelled, even when the next game has not gone off yet. If the first game wins, you will have action on the next game. For that reason, there is less control over an “if” bet than over two straight bets. When both games you bet overlap in time, however, the only way to bet one only when another wins is by placing an “if” bet. Obviously, when two games overlap in time, cancellation of the next game bet is not an issue. It ought to be noted, that after both games start at different times, most books will not permit you to fill in the next game later. You should designate both teams when you make the bet.
You possibly can make an “if” bet by saying to the bookmaker, “I wish to make an ‘if’ bet,” and then, “Give me Team A IF Team B for $100.” Giving your bookmaker that instruction will be the identical to betting $110 to win $100 on Team A, and then, only when Team A wins, betting another $110 to win $100 on Team B.
If the first team in the “if” bet loses, there is no bet on the next team. Irrespective of whether the next team wins of loses, your total loss on the “if” bet will be $110 when you lose on the first team. If the first team wins, however, you would have a bet of $110 to win $100 going on the next team. In that case, if the next team loses, your total loss will be just the $10 of vig on the split of both teams. If both games win, you would win $100 on Team A and $100 on Team B, for an overall total win of $200. Thus, the maximum loss on an “if” will be $110, and the maximum win will be $200. That is balanced by the disadvantage of losing the entire $110, rather than $10 of vig, everytime the teams split with the first team in the bet losing.
Bettors soon learned that the way to avoid the uncertainty caused by the order of wins and loses is to make two “if” bets putting each team first. As opposed to betting $110 on ” Team A if Team B,” you would bet just $55 on ” Team A if Team B.” and then create a second “if” bet reversing the order of the teams for another $55. The 2nd bet would put Team B first and Team A second. This sort of double bet, reversing the order of exactly the same two teams, is known as an “if/reverse” or sometimes just a “reverse.”
If both teams win, the effect will be the same just like you played an individual “if” bet for $100. You win $50 on Team A in the first “if bet, and then $50 on Team B, for an overall total win of $100. In the next “if” bet, you win $50 on Team B, and then $50 on Team A, for an overall total win of $100. The two “if” bets together cause a total win of $200 when both teams win.
If both teams lose, the effect would also be just like if you played an individual “if” bet for $100. Team A’s loss would cost you $55 in the first “if” combination, and nothing would look at Team B. In the next combination, Team B’s loss would cost you $55 and nothing would look at to Team A. You would lose $55 on each of the bets for an overall total maximum loss in $110 whenever both teams lose.
The difference occurs when the teams split. As opposed to losing $110 when the first team loses and the next wins, and $10 when the first team wins but the next loses, in the reverse you will lose $60 on a divided no matter which team wins and which loses. It calculates this way. If Team A loses you will lose $55 on the first combination, and have nothing going on the winning Team B. In the next combination, you will win $50 on Team B, and have action on Team A for a $55 loss, producing a net loss on the next mixture of $5 vig. The loss of $55 on the first “if” bet and $5 on the next “if” bet provides you with a mixed loss in $60 on the “reverse.” When Team B loses, you will lose the $5 vig on the first combination and the $55 on the next combination for exactly the same $60 on the split..
We’ve accomplished this smaller loss in $60 in place of $110 when the first team loses without any decrease in the win when both teams win. In the single $110 “if” bet and both reversed “if” bets for $55, the win is $200 when both teams cover the spread. The bookmakers would never put themselves at that kind of disadvantage, however. The gain of $50 whenever Team A loses is fully offset by the excess $50 loss ($60 in place of $10) whenever Team B is the loser. Thus, the “reverse” doesn’t actually save us anything, but it does have the main advantage of making the danger more predictable, and preventing the worry as to which team to put first in the “if” bet.
DON’T, when you can win a lot more than 52.5% or maybe more of your games. If you cannot consistently achieve a profitable percentage, however, making “if” bets when you bet two teams can save you money.
For the winning bettor, the “if” bet adds some luck to your betting equation that doesn’t belong there. If two games are worth betting, then they ought to both be bet. Betting on you need to not be produced influenced by if you win another. แทงมวยไทย On another hand, for the bettor who includes a negative expectation, the “if” bet will prevent him from betting on the next team whenever the first team loses. By preventing some bets, the “if” bet saves the negative expectation bettor some vig.
The $10 savings for the “if” bettor results from the truth that he is not betting the next game when both lose. Compared to the straight bettor, the “if” bettor posseses an additional cost of $100 when Team A loses and Team B wins, but he saves $110 when Team A and Team B both lose.
The rule for the winning bettor is precisely opposite. Whatever keeps the winning bettor from betting more games is bad, and therefore “if” bets will cost the winning handicapper money. When the winning bettor plays fewer games, he’s fewer winners. Understand that the next time someone tells you that the way to win is always to bet fewer games. A good winner never desires to bet fewer games. Since “if/reverses” work out the same as “if” bets, they both place the winner at an equal disadvantage.
Exceptions to the Rule – Whenever a Winner Should Bet Parlays and “IF’s”
Just like all rules, you can find exceptions. “If” bets and parlays must certanly be made by successful with a confident expectation in mere two circumstances::
When there is no other choice and he must bet either an “if/reverse,” a parlay, or a teaser; or
When betting co-dependent propositions.
The only time I could think of that you have no other choice is if you should be the most effective man at your friend’s wedding, you’re waiting to walk down the aisle, your laptop looked ridiculous in the pocket of your tux so you left it in the vehicle, you merely bet offshore in a deposit account without any credit line, the book includes a $50 minimum phone bet, you want two games which overlap in time, you take out your trusty cell 5 minutes before kickoff and 45 seconds before you need to walk to the alter with some beastly bride’s maid in a frilly purple dress in your arm, you try to make two $55 bets and suddenly realize you merely have $75 in your account.
Since the old philosopher used to express, “Is that what’s troubling you, bucky?” If so, hold your mind up high, put a look on your face, try to find the silver lining, and create a $50 “if” bet in your two teams. Obviously you could bet a parlay, but as you will dsicover below, the “if/reverse” is a good substitute for the parlay if you should be winner.
For the winner, the most effective method is straight betting. In the case of co-dependent bets, however, as already discussed, there is a massive advantage to betting combinations. With a parlay, the bettor is getting the main benefit of increased parlay odds of 13-5 on combined bets that have greater compared to the normal expectation of winning. Since, by definition, co-dependent bets must often be contained within exactly the same game, they have to be produced as “if” bets. With a co-dependent bet our advantage arises from the truth that we make the next bet only IF one of many propositions wins.
It would do us no good to straight bet $110 each on the favourite and the underdog and $110 each on the over and the under. We’d simply lose the vig no matter how often the favorite and over or the underdog and under combinations won. As we’ve seen, if we play two out of 4 possible results in two parlays of the favourite and over and the underdog and under, we are able to net a $160 win when certainly one of our combinations comes in. When to choose the parlay or the “reverse” when making co-dependent combinations is discussed below.
Choosing Between “IF” Bets and Parlays
Centered on a $110 parlay, which we’ll use for the goal of consistent comparisons, our net parlay win when certainly one of our combinations hits is $176 (the $286 win on the winning parlay without the $110 loss on the losing parlay). In a $110 “reverse” bet our net win will be $180 everytime certainly one of our combinations hits (the $400 win on the winning if/reverse without the $220 loss on the losing if/reverse).